Adult qSOFA Calculator (Sepsis-3)
Calculate the original adult Sepsis-3 qSOFA prognostic prompt from respiratory rate, altered mentation, and systolic blood pressure.
Content updated: View sources
QuickMedCalc is developed and maintained by an independent developer. Medical content is not independently reviewed by a physician.
Formula and medical content are based on the references listed on this page. See sources, About, and Sources and Review Process.
About
Adult qSOFA is the three-item Sepsis-3 prognostic prompt for a known or suspected infection context: respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and altered mentation. The original prompt is a 0–3 score with an original ≥2 prompt threshold; this page uses a conservative same-assessment pairing contract so that the three submitted observations are not stitched together from different moments. It records an external mentation assessment and does not perform a GCS examination. [1, 2]
qSOFA does not define, diagnose, stage, or exclude sepsis, and it does not diagnose septic shock or provide a personal mortality probability. This page does not calculate full SOFA, SIRS, NEWS/NEWS2, MEWS, or Phoenix, and it does not choose antibiotics, cultures, lactate testing, fluids, vasoactive medicines, ICU care, referral, or monitoring frequency. It only calculates the submitted observations in the stated adult context. [2, 5, 6, 7]
Formula
Interpretation
| Output | Formal range/state | Meaning | What it does not mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adult qSOFA total | 0–3 | Three-item prognostic prompt total | Not a sepsis diagnosis |
| Original ≥2 prompt | Met / not met | Original further-assessment prompt state | Not a treatment or ICU instruction |
| Altered mentation | Present / absent / not assessable | External assessment category | Not a page-performed GCS examination |
| Pairing confirmation | Confirmed | Conservative data pairing used by this page | Not the original requirement for identical-minute measurement |
Sepsis-3 operationalization uses suspected infection plus an acute full-SOFA increase of at least 2; qSOFA is not that definition. Scores ≥2 were associated with poorer outcomes in the original prognostic work, while a score below 2 cannot exclude sepsis, organ dysfunction, or deterioration. This page does not provide dynamic low/high-risk labels or a personal mortality estimate. [1, 2, 3]
Adult qSOFA criteria, model boundaries, and current screening context
Formal three-item qSOFA criteria
Each adult criterion contributes one point: respiratory rate ≥22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg, or altered mentation. Exact 22 and 100 values are included; 21.9 and 100.1 are not. [1, 2]
| Criterion | One-point definition | Exact boundary | Page input | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory rate | ≥22 breaths/min | 22 is included; 21.9 is not | Positive ordinary decimal | Records the submitted vital sign; it does not measure the patient. |
| Systolic blood pressure | ≤100 mmHg | 100 is included; 100.1 is not | Positive ordinary decimal | Treatment, vasoactive support, and clinical context can affect interpretation. |
| Altered mentation | Altered mentation | Sepsis-3 bedside wording; GCS <15 is its stated explanation | External present/absent/not-assessable assessment | The page does not perform or reconstruct a GCS examination. |
Altered mentation and assessability
The derivation model used GCS ≤13 for its mental-status variable, while a sensitivity analysis used the simpler any altered mentation approach represented by GCS <15 without a significant change in prognostic performance. Sepsis-3’s final bedside qSOFA wording is altered mentation, explained as any GCS <15. This page records an already completed external assessment and cannot verify or reconstruct it. Sedation, intubation, neuromuscular blockade, intoxication, post-ictal state, hearing or language barriers, dementia, baseline cognitive impairment, and prior neurologic disease can make it unreliable. Choose Not assessable rather than silently treating uncertainty as absent. [1, 2]
Infection context and conservative data pairing
qSOFA was developed in adults with known or suspected infection; this checkbox does not diagnose infection. The derivation work used measurements around the suspected-infection time and tested different windows. The page’s explicit same-assessment confirmation is a conservative site data-pairing rule to avoid creating a score from observations that were never documented together; it is not a claim that the original study required the same minute, not the original requirement for identical-minute measurement. [1, 2]
What this calculator actually does
- Confirms an adult known or suspected infection context.
- Confirms the conservative same-assessment pairing used by this page.
- Reads respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and an external mentation assessment.
- Applies the three fixed criteria and, only when all are assessable, reports 0–3 and the original ≥2 state.
- Withholds the total when mentation is not assessable and retains a three-row audit.
It does not diagnose infection, sepsis, or septic shock; read GCS, monitor vital signs, calculate full SOFA, or select testing, treatment, or care location.
qSOFA, full SOFA, SIRS, NEWS/NEWS2, and MEWS
These frameworks have different variables, weights, time windows, and purposes and their scores cannot be converted. The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends NEWS, NEWS2, MEWS, or SIRS rather than qSOFA alone for screening hospitalized acutely ill adults. [2, 5]
| Framework | Inputs | Main use | Current boundary | Why not interchangeable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qSOFA | RR, SBP, altered mentation | Short adult prognostic prompt | 0–3; original ≥2 prompt | It is not full organ-function assessment or a sepsis definition. |
| Full SOFA | Six organ systems | Organ dysfunction operationalization and serial assessment | An acute increase of ≥2 is part of Sepsis-3 | Different inputs, scale, and clinical task. |
| SIRS | Temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate/PaCO₂, WBC | Different systemic-response framework | Not a qSOFA conversion | Different variables and intended use. |
| NEWS/NEWS2 | Early-warning vital-sign and oxygenation inputs | Acute deterioration early warning | 2026 SSC prefers it over qSOFA alone for hospitalized acutely ill adults | Different weighted system and response pathway. |
| MEWS | Early-warning physiologic inputs | Acute deterioration early warning | 2026 SSC names it among preferred single screening tools | Not equivalent to qSOFA points or Sepsis-3 SOFA. |
Prognostic performance and setting limitations
Fernando’s systematic review and meta-analysis included 38 studies and 385,333 people and reported pooled mortality sensitivity of 60.8% and specificity of 72.0%. Those are population-level estimates, not an individual probability and not an exclusion rule. In ICU adults with suspected infection, Raith found full SOFA had better prognostic discrimination than qSOFA. [3, 4]
Sepsis, septic shock, and qSOFA
qSOFA is a prognostic prompt, sepsis is a clinical diagnosis with an organ-dysfunction framework, and septic shock has separate circulatory and metabolic criteria. A qSOFA score cannot diagnose either sepsis or septic shock. [2, 5, 6]
| Concept | What it requires | What this page does |
|---|---|---|
| qSOFA | Three adult bedside criteria in a known or suspected infection context | Calculates the original 0–3 prognostic prompt only |
| Sepsis | Clinical infection plus life-threatening organ dysfunction; Sepsis-3 uses an acute full-SOFA increase ≥2 | Does not diagnose, confirm, or exclude sepsis |
| Septic shock | Separate clinical and circulatory/metabolic criteria | Does not diagnose shock or select treatment |
Adult and pediatric boundary
This page is restricted to adult qSOFA. Phoenix Sepsis Criteria are a separate pediatric framework; the page does not apply fixed adult criteria to children and does not calculate the 2024 Phoenix pediatric sepsis and septic-shock framework, which is not an early-screening substitute. [7]
Worked examples from the frozen implementation
- RR 21.9, SBP 100.1, altered mentation absent → score 0; the original ≥2 prompt is not met, but a score below 2 cannot exclude sepsis or deterioration.
- At the exact boundaries RR 22 and SBP 100 with altered mentation absent → score 2; the original prompt is met, not a sepsis diagnosis.
- RR 22, SBP 100, altered mentation present → score 3; the page gives no personal mortality probability, risk color, or treatment recommendation.
- Decimal comparisons use the exact submitted values before display formatting, so values such as RR 21.999999999999999999 remain below 22 and RR 22.000000000000000001 remains at or above 22.
- RR 22, SBP 120, and altered mentation not assessable → no total or result card; the unavailable state does not show a partial score or prompt state.
- RR, SBP, and mentation must belong to the confirmed assessment; the site’s conservative pairing rule must not stitch different assessments together, and it is not the original same-minute requirement.
Examples show frozen arithmetic only; none is a diagnosis, personal risk estimate, or treatment instruction. [1, 2]
Current 2026 screening context
The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends NEWS, NEWS2, MEWS, or SIRS rather than qSOFA alone as a single screening tool for hospitalized acutely ill adults. No single score, biomarker, or test independently confirms or excludes sepsis. This page preserves qSOFA’s original prompt as historical/model-specific context and does not rebrand it as the current universal screen. [5]
Important limitations
- This adult prompt is not validated here for children or pregnancy, and non-infection contexts are outside its intended scope. qSOFA does not replace continuous clinical assessment or an ICU assessment pathway.
- Mechanical ventilation, intubation, oxygen therapy, sedation, neuromuscular blockade or paralysis, vasoactive therapy, prior fluids or other treatment, and respiratory support can alter observations or assessability.
- Intoxication, seizure or post-ictal state, dementia, delirium, baseline neurologic impairment, hearing or language barriers, and measurement error can affect altered-mentation assessment.
- Manual respiratory-rate measurement error, cuff-versus-arterial systolic-pressure differences, rapidly changing physiology, mismatched assessment timepoints, and incomplete organ assessment can change interpretation. Delayed deterioration remains possible.
- A score of 0 or 1 does not mean safe, and a score of 2 or 3 does not mean sepsis. Do not wait for an online calculator when a patient is unstable; use complete clinical assessment, serial organ-function review, and local screening pathways.
- Do not infer antibiotics, fluids, cultures, lactate, ICU placement, referral, monitoring, or other treatment from the score.
qSOFA does not replace continuous clinical assessment, and an unstable patient must not wait for an online calculator. The page does not read records or devices, and calculator inputs and results remain outside URLs, storage, analytics, advertising, and network payloads. [1, 2, 4, 5, 7]
References
- Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2016;315(8):762–774. PMID 26903335. PMCID PMC5433435. DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. PMID 26903338. PMCID PMC4968574. DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
- Fernando SM, Tran A, Taljaard M, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(4):266–275. PMID 29404582. DOI 10.7326/M17-2820.
- Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA. 2017;317(3):290–300. PMID 28114553. DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
- Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026. PMID 41869847. DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007075.
- Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock. JAMA. 2016;315(8):775–787. PMID 26903336. PMCID PMC4910392. DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
- Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, et al. International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2024;331(8):665–674. PMID 38245889. DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.0179.
FAQ
Sedation, intubation, neuromuscular blockade, intoxication, a post-ictal state, hearing or language barriers, dementia, baseline cognitive impairment, and prior neurologic disease can prevent reliable assessment. The page withholds the total rather than counting uncertainty as absent.
The original work evaluated measurements around the suspected-infection time and tested time windows; it did not require the same minute. This page uses a conservative same-assessment rule to avoid stitching observations from different moments into an artificial score.
Sources: [1]
No. Adult fixed qSOFA criteria do not apply to children. The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Criteria are a separate pediatric sepsis and septic-shock framework and are not calculated here.
Sources: [7]
Related Calculators
Classic SOFA-1
Calculate the original 1996 Classic SOFA-1 score from the worst eligible values in one defined 24-hour window, with an optional comparable-baseline change.
Classic SIRS
Count the classic 1992 adult systemic inflammatory response criteria from submitted measurements, without diagnosing sepsis.
GCS
Record the standard adult Glasgow Coma Scale eye, verbal, and motor responses, including documented not-testable components without creating a misleading total.
Disclaimer
Educational and informational reference only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or independent verification.