M+QuickMedCalc
Educational reference only. Not a diagnostic tool. See full disclaimer.
Emergency Medicine & Critical CareRASS

Adult RASS Assessment (Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale)

Describe adult observed agitation or sedation with the original RASS assessment sequence.

Content updated: View sources

QuickMedCalc is developed and maintained by an independent developer. Medical content is not independently reviewed by a physician.

Formula and medical content are based on the references listed on this page. See sources, About, and Sources and Review Process.

If an assessment cannot be reliably made, select not assessable; it is a QuickMedCalc safety state, not a −5 score or an additional RASS level.

Confirm this is an adult ICU assessment.

Confirm the standard sequence was followed.

About

Adult RASS follows the original observed sequence: first agitation or alertness, then response to voice when the person is not alert, then physical stimulation only when there is no response to voice. It is an assessment descriptor, not a direct score picker. [1, 2]

The form records the observations that justify a descriptor rather than asking a user to choose +4 through −5. A not-assessable path withholds calculation when the sequence cannot be completed reliably; it is a software safety state, not another RASS level. [1]

Formula

RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to −5 (unarousable). [1]
Use the first matching response in the observation → voice → physical-stimulation sequence. [1, 2]

Interpretation

ScoreOriginal termOriginal description
+4CombativeOvertly combative or violent; immediate danger to staff.
+3Very agitatedPulls/removes tubes or catheters; aggressive.
+2AgitatedFrequent non-purposeful movement or ventilator dyssynchrony.
+1RestlessAnxious or apprehensive, not aggressive or vigorous.
0Alert and calmAlert and calm.
−1DrowsySustained eye contact to voice (>10 seconds).
−2Light sedationBrief eye contact to voice (<10 seconds).
−3Moderate sedationMovement or eye opening to voice, no eye contact.
−4Deep sedationNo response to voice; movement or eye opening to physical stimulation.
−5UnarousableNo response to voice or physical stimulation.

The table describes the original ten-level adult scale; QuickMedCalc does not add not-assessable as an eleventh level. [1]

RASS observation sequence, assessability, and static ICU context

Why the page uses an assessment sequence

RASS is an observed descriptor, not a number-selection exercise. The original adult validation uses a fixed sequence: record spontaneous agitation or alertness first, assess response to voice when the person is not alert, and use physical stimulation only when there is no response to voice. The sequence preserves the observation that supports the final descriptor. [1, 2]

Not-assessable is a safety state, not an RASS level

The original adult RASS scale has ten levels from +4 through −5. QuickMedCalc uses not-assessable to withhold a score when the required response cannot be assessed reliably; it is not an eleventh level, and it is not silently converted to −5. [1]

Ventilation and specific assessment barriers

Mechanical ventilation or an endotracheal tube alone does not make a RASS assessment unassessable; the original adult validation included ventilated and non-ventilated ICU patients. Assessment may instead be limited by a specific barrier such as neuromuscular blockade, severe neurologic dysfunction, inability to observe the required response, communication barriers, or another condition that prevents a reliable sequence. [1, 2]

Adult implementation and pediatric validation

This implementation is limited to adult critical-care assessments. RASS itself has also been studied and validated in critically ill children, but this page does not provide pediatric interpretation or replace local pediatric assessment protocols. [1, 7]

Static PADIS context — not calculated

The 2018 PADIS guideline suggests light rather than deep sedation for appropriate mechanically ventilated adults. RASS does not set a universal target; the target depends on the person, treatment purpose, and applicable protocol. [3, 5]

The 2025 focused update conditionally suggests dexmedetomidine over propofol when light sedation and/or reducing delirium is the highest priority. This is static guideline context only: this page does not choose a medicine, dose, or target score. [4, 6]

References

  1. Sessler CN, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–1344. PMID 12421743. DOI 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
  2. Ely EW, et al. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients. JAMA. 2003;289(22):2983–2991. PMID 12799407. DOI 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
  3. Devlin JW, et al. PADIS guideline. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–e873. PMID 30113379. DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
  4. Lewis K, et al. Focused PADIS update. Crit Care Med. 2025;53(3):e711–e727. PMID 39982143. DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006574.
  5. SCCM. Adult ICU PADIS guidance.
  6. SCCM. Focused PADIS update.
  7. Kerson AG, DeMaria R, Mauer E, et al. Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children. Journal of Intensive Care. 2016;4:65. PMID 27800163. PMCID PMC5080705. DOI 10.1186/s40560-016-0189-5.

FAQ

Related Calculators

Disclaimer

Educational and informational reference only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or independent verification.