M+QuickMedCalc
Educational reference only. Not a diagnostic tool. See full disclaimer.
Emergency Medicine & Critical CareWells PE

Wells Score Calculator for PE

Calculate the weighted Wells PE pretest-probability score with two-level and three-level classifications.

Content updated: View sources

QuickMedCalc is developed and maintained by an independent developer. Medical content is not independently reviewed by a physician.

Formula and medical content are based on the references listed on this page. See sources, About, and Sources and Review Process.

All seven criteria are required

Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins.

A subjective clinical judgment; it is not a laboratory or imaging finding.

A heart rate of exactly 100 does not score this item.

Immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks.

A documented prior venous thromboembolism history.

Coughing blood.

Active, treated within the previous 6 months, or palliative.

Wells PE score

A pretest-probability reference only; it does not diagnose or exclude pulmonary embolism.

About

The Wells PE score is a weighted pretest-probability rule for adults with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. It was derived for a clinical assessment rather than asymptomatic screening, and the seven selections are applied before the appropriate diagnostic pathway. The original derivation and bedside management work support a structured assessment, but the score cannot diagnose or exclude PE by itself. [1, 2]

This page calculates only the selected criteria and their validated point total. “PE more likely than an alternative diagnosis” is a clinician judgment; the calculator does not verify signs, history, records, vital signs, D-dimer, or imaging. A pretest label is not a confirmed-PE severity, mortality, disposition, or treatment score. The algorithm was studied in pathways that also require clinical examination and appropriate testing, including the management approach described by the Christopher study. [3, 4, 5]

Formula

Weighted Wells PE score = sum of seven assessed criteria (0–12.5 points). [1]
Modified two-level model: ≤4 PE unlikely; >4 PE likely. [2, 6]
Standard three-level model: <2 low, 2–6 moderate, >6 high pretest probability. [1]

Interpretation

Wells PE classification models
ModelScore rangePublished labelWhat it means and does not mean
Modified two-level≤4.0 / >4.0PE unlikely / PE likelyA pretest-probability grouping used in some adult pathways; 4.0 is unlikely and 4.5 is likely. It is not exclusion, confirmation, or a treatment instruction.
Standard three-level<2 / 2–6 / >6Low / Moderate / High pretest probabilityA three-group model. Scores 2.0 and 6.0 are moderate; the label is model terminology, not an individual probability or diagnosis.

Pretest probability groups the selected history and findings before D-dimer blood testing or imaging. “PE unlikely” does not mean PE has been ruled out, and “PE likely” does not mean PE has been confirmed. D-dimer and imaging decisions depend on the applicable adult pathway, assay, presentation, examination, and local resources; some suitable adults older than 50 use an FEU threshold of age × 10 µg/L, which this page does not apply. NICE two-level Wells guidance applies to adults, not pregnancy or people under 18. PERC and YEARS are separate rules, not alternate labels for this score. The page does not calculate PERC, YEARS, age-adjusted D-dimer, PESI/sPESI, or the 2026 AHA/ACC Acute PE Clinical Categories A–E. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Wells PE criteria, model boundaries, and examples

Seven weighted criteria

The table below preserves the original seven-item wording and points. It describes what a submitted Yes means; it does not perform an examination or retrieve a history.

Seven weighted Wells PE criteria
CriterionPointsRequired interpretationImportant boundary
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT3Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins.Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins are the original clinical signs; this page does not verify an examination.
PE more likely than an alternative diagnosis3A subjective clinical judgment; it is not a laboratory or imaging finding.This is a clinician judgment about the leading alternative, not a laboratory or imaging finding and not an automatic diagnosis.
Heart rate over 100 beats/min1.5A heart rate of exactly 100 does not score this item.The threshold is strictly over 100 beats/min; exactly 100 receives zero points.
Immobilization or recent surgery1.5Immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks.The original weighted model says immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks. NICE NG158 uses adapted wording of more than 3 days.
Previous DVT or PE1.5A documented prior venous thromboembolism history.Use a documented previous venous thromboembolism history; the calculator does not retrieve a medical record.
Hemoptysis1Coughing blood.The item is hemoptysis (coughing blood), not a general respiratory symptom.
Malignancy1Active, treated within the previous 6 months, or palliative.The original definition includes active cancer, treatment within the previous 6 months, or palliative disease.

The original derivation uses immobilization for at least 3 days. NICE NG158 uses adapted wording of more than 3 days; those phrases should not be silently mixed. [1, 6]

What this calculator actually does

It (1) reads seven explicit Yes/No selections, (2) validates that none is unassessed, (3) uses the frozen weighted implementation, and (4) reports the total with both published classification labels and a complete audit of all seven responses. It does not inspect records, auto-identify DVT, validate the heart rate, apply D-dimer or imaging rules, select CTPA or V/Q testing, choose anticoagulation, or grade a confirmed PE. It provides no treatment recommendation nor an imaging order.

Wells and other PE tools are not interchangeable

Comparison of pulmonary embolism assessment tools
ModelIntended stageInputs or purposeWhy it cannot be substituted here
Wells PESuspected adult acute PESeven weighted clinical criteriaThis page computes only this model.
PERCSelected very-low-suspicion adultsEight different rule-out criteriaA low Wells score does not make every PERC item negative. [9]
D-dimerLaboratory step in a pathwayAssay-specific fibrin degradation measurementThis page has no assay result or cutoff. Age-adjusted approaches are separate. [10]
YEARSSuspected PE diagnostic algorithmThree items plus its own D-dimer thresholdsIts items, thresholds, and validation are not the seven Wells criteria. [11]
Pregnancy-adapted YEARSPregnancy-specific diagnostic pathwayPregnancy context, YEARS items, and D-dimerIt is not a general Wells calculation. [12]
PESI / sPESIAfter PE is diagnosedPrognostic severity and short-term risk variablesA confirmed-PE severity model cannot be derived from Wells. [4, 5, 8]
AHA/ACC 2026 categoriesConfirmed acute PEPost-diagnosis clinical severity frameworkThe 2026 AHA/ACC Acute PE Clinical Categories A–E apply after pulmonary embolism has been confirmed. They are not a pretest-probability score and are not calculated here. [4, 5, 7, 8]

The 2026 AHA/ACC categories apply after pulmonary embolism has been confirmed and are not calculated by this Wells page. [4, 5]

Worked examples from the frozen implementation

  • 0.0 points: all seven No responses produce PE unlikely and Low pretest probability. That label does not alone exclude PE.
  • 4.0 points: DVT signs Yes (+3) and hemoptysis Yes (+1) produce PE unlikely and Moderate pretest probability.
  • 4.5 points: DVT signs Yes (+3) and heart rate over 100 Yes (+1.5) produce PE likely and Moderate pretest probability.

These examples demonstrate arithmetic and boundary behavior, not patient-level probability, diagnosis, imaging, disposition, or treatment.

Limitations and special contexts

Children, pregnancy, recurrent PE, already-anticoagulated patients, inpatients, recent surgery, active cancer, confirmed PE, unstable presentations, and urgent or resuscitation settings may differ from the populations, timing, or pathways used to validate a Wells model. The arithmetic remains reproducible, but those contexts can change pretest assessment and the evidence supporting a pathway. Do not let a calculator delay urgent evaluation. NICE, ASH, ESC, and AHA/ACC guidance should be read in their full clinical context. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

References

  1. Wells PS, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420. PMID 10744147.
  2. Wells PS, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98-107. PMID 11453709.
  3. van Belle A, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm. Lancet. 2006;367:113-119. PMID 16413875.
  4. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults. Circulation. PMID 41712677. DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001415.
  5. Creager MA, Barnes GD, Giri J, et al. Correction to: 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults. Circulation. 2026;154(2):e24. PMID 42441758. DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001462.
  6. NICE NG158. Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing.
  7. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3226-3256. PMID 30482764. DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024828.
  8. Konstantinides SV, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:543-603. PMID 31473594.
  9. Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:772-780. PMID 18318689.
  10. Righini M, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: ADJUST-PE. JAMA. 2014;311:1117-1124. PMID 24686878. DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
  11. van der Hulle T, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study). Lancet. 2017;390:289-297. PMID 28549662. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1.
  12. van der Pol LM, et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1139-1149. PMID 30893534. DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1813865.

FAQ

Related Calculators

Disclaimer

Educational and informational reference only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or independent verification.