M+QuickMedCalc
Educational reference only. Not a diagnostic tool. See full disclaimer.
Emergency Medicine & Critical CareWells PE

Wells Score Calculator for Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Calculate the seven-criterion Wells score for pulmonary embolism with modified two-level and standard three-level classifications.

Content updated: View sources

QuickMedCalc is developed and maintained by an independent developer. Medical content is not independently reviewed by a physician.

Formula and medical content are based on the references listed on this page. See sources, About, and Sources and Review Process.

PE model only: This calculator is the Wells score for pulmonary embolism, not the separate Wells DVT score.

All seven criteria are required

Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins.

A subjective clinical judgment; it is not a laboratory or imaging finding.

A heart rate of exactly 100 does not score this item.

Immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks.

A documented prior venous thromboembolism history.

Coughing blood.

Active, treated within the previous 6 months, or palliative.

Wells score for pulmonary embolism

—

A pretest-probability reference only; it does not diagnose or exclude pulmonary embolism.

About

This Wells score calculator applies the seven weighted Wells criteria for pulmonary embolism (PE) in adults with suspected acute PE. It reports one score with the modified two-level and standard three-level pretest-probability classifications. [1, 2, 3, 4]

This is the Wells score for PE, not the separate Wells DVT score. It cannot diagnose or exclude PE by itself, verify the submitted findings, choose a D-dimer or imaging pathway, grade confirmed PE, or recommend treatment. [3, 4, 5]

Formula

Weighted Wells PE score = sum of seven assessed criteria (0–12.5 points). [1]
Modified two-level model: ≤4 PE unlikely; >4 PE likely. [2, 5]
Standard three-level model: <2 low, 2–6 moderate, >6 high pretest probability. [1]

Interpretation

Model
Modified two-level
Score range
≤4.0 / >4.0
Published label
PE unlikely / PE likely
What it means and does not mean
A pretest-probability grouping used in some adult pathways; 4.0 is unlikely and 4.5 is likely. It is not exclusion, confirmation, or a treatment instruction.
Model
Standard three-level
Score range
<2 / 2–6 / >6
Published label
Low / Moderate / High pretest probability
What it means and does not mean
A three-group model. Scores 2.0 and 6.0 are moderate; the label is model terminology, not an individual probability or diagnosis.

The modified two-level result is shown first because current adult suspected-PE pathways commonly use the ≤4 / >4 split. The standard three-level classification remains a valid, separate presentation of the same score. Neither label is a diagnosis, exclusion, individual probability, or treatment instruction. [3, 4, 5]

Wells Score and criteria for pulmonary embolism

What the Wells PE score calculates

The score sums seven explicitly assessed findings from an adult suspected-PE evaluation. “PE more likely than an alternative diagnosis” is intentionally a clinician judgment rather than a laboratory or imaging finding. This page validates that every item has been assessed, then reports the frozen weighted total and both published classification systems; it does not inspect a record or infer any criterion. [1, 3, 4]

Seven Wells criteria and points

The table below preserves the original seven-item wording and points. It describes what a submitted Yes means; it does not perform an examination or retrieve a history.

Criterion
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT
Points
3
Required interpretation
Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins.
Important boundary
Leg swelling and pain with palpation of the deep veins are the original clinical signs; this page does not verify an examination.
Criterion
PE more likely than an alternative diagnosis
Points
3
Required interpretation
A subjective clinical judgment; it is not a laboratory or imaging finding.
Important boundary
This is a clinician judgment about the leading alternative, not a laboratory or imaging finding and not an automatic diagnosis.
Criterion
Heart rate over 100 beats/min
Points
1.5
Required interpretation
A heart rate of exactly 100 does not score this item.
Important boundary
The threshold is strictly over 100 beats/min; exactly 100 receives zero points.
Criterion
Immobilization or recent surgery
Points
1.5
Required interpretation
Immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks.
Important boundary
The original weighted model says immobilization for at least 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks. NICE NG158 uses adapted wording of more than 3 days.
Criterion
Previous DVT or PE
Points
1.5
Required interpretation
A documented prior venous thromboembolism history.
Important boundary
Use a documented previous venous thromboembolism history; the calculator does not retrieve a medical record.
Criterion
Hemoptysis
Points
1
Required interpretation
Coughing blood.
Important boundary
The item is hemoptysis (coughing blood), not a general respiratory symptom.
Criterion
Malignancy
Points
1
Required interpretation
Active, treated within the previous 6 months, or palliative.
Important boundary
The original definition includes active cancer, treatment within the previous 6 months, or palliative disease.

The original derivation uses immobilization for at least 3 days. NICE NG158 uses adapted wording of more than 3 days; those phrases should not be silently mixed. [1, 5]

Modified two-level vs standard three-level interpretation

The modified model uses ≤4 PE unlikely and >4 PE likely; the standard model uses <2 low, 2–6 moderate, and >6 high pretest probability. Thus 4.0 is PE unlikely, 4.5 is PE likely, 6.0 remains moderate, and a score above 6 is high. Current NICE guidance specifically uses the two-level model, while the 2026 AHA/ACC guideline lists both. [3, 4, 5]

PE Wells and DVT Wells are separate models

Wells scores exist for both pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis, but their criteria, weights, and intended tasks are different. This page calculates only the seven-item weighted Wells score for pulmonary embolism. “Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT” is one PE criterion; it does not turn this result into a DVT Wells score. [1, 3, 4]

Where D-dimer, PERC, and YEARS fit

Wells is a pretest-probability step. D-dimer is a separate laboratory step whose meaning depends on the pathway and assay; age-adjusted D-dimer is also separate. PERC is an eight-item rule for selected very-low-suspicion adults, while YEARS uses three clinical items with its own D-dimer thresholds. None can be inferred from this seven-item score, and this page does not calculate them or choose imaging. [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Important populations and limitations

NICE two-level Wells guidance applies to adults and excludes pregnancy and people under 18. Pregnancy-specific assessment, recurrent PE, anticoagulation, hospitalization, cancer, confirmed PE, and unstable or resuscitation settings can require different evidence or pathways. A confirmed-PE severity score such as PESI/sPESI is a different task. Do not let this calculator delay urgent evaluation, and do not use it as an imaging order, disposition rule, or treatment recommendation. [3, 4, 5, 9]

References

  1. Wells PS, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420. PMID 10744147.
  2. Wells PS, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98-107. PMID 11453709.
  3. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults. Circulation. PMID 41712677. DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001415.
  4. Creager MA, Barnes GD, Giri J, et al. Correction to: 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults. Circulation. 2026;154(2):e24. PMID 42441758. DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001462.
  5. NICE NG158. Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing.
  6. Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:772-780. PMID 18318689.
  7. Righini M, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: ADJUST-PE. JAMA. 2014;311:1117-1124. PMID 24686878. DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
  8. van der Hulle T, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study). Lancet. 2017;390:289-297. PMID 28549662. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1.
  9. van der Pol LM, et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1139-1149. PMID 30893534. DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1813865.

FAQ

Related Calculators

Disclaimer

Educational and informational reference only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or independent verification.