M+QuickMedCalc
Educational reference only. Not a diagnostic tool. See full disclaimer.
NephrologyFEUrea

Fractional Excretion of Urea (FEUrea) Calculator

Calculate paired urine and serum FEUrea (FEUN) after independent exact normalization of BUN mg/dL or whole urea mmol/L and urine/serum creatinine in mg/dL or µmol/L, with no AKI-cause or treatment output.

Content updated: View sources

QuickMedCalc is developed and maintained by an independent developer. Medical content is not independently reviewed by a physician.

Formula and medical content are based on the references listed on this page. See sources, About, and Sources and Review Process.

Enter paired urine and serum measurements and select the unit actually reported for each analyte. The page calculates a neutral percentage only.

Urine BUN or urea may be zero.

A real unit switch clears the corresponding value.

Must be greater than zero.

A real unit switch clears the corresponding value.

Must be greater than zero.

A real unit switch clears the corresponding value.

Must be greater than zero.

A real unit switch clears the corresponding value.

This confirmation is required before calculating.

About

This page calculates FEUrea from paired urine and serum specimens using urine and serum BUN or whole urea plus urine and serum creatinine. Each urea-related result is normalized independently to BUN mg/dL and each creatinine result to mg/dL. It reports one percentage and four normalized audit values. FEUN and FEUrea refer here to the same fractional-excretion- of-urea-nitrogen arithmetic. It does not calculate FENa, AKI diagnosis, stage, or cause.[1, 11, 12, 13]

Carvounis 2002 supported the historical prerenal context at or below 35%, including its diuretic-treated study group. Later Pépin and Darmon studies found substantially weaker performance. The 35% convention was never a certain etiologic boundary for every person with AKI, and this page never assigns prerenal, intrinsic, or ATN labels.[1, 2, 3]

Current syntheses remain limited: the 2024 review found limited utility without universal superiority over FENa, while the 2026 review reported moderate accuracy and a possible adjunct role with high heterogeneity and low certainty. Loop diuretics, critical illness, and specimen timing can change interpretation. This page does not diagnose, stage, determine cause, or generate treatment advice.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Formula

FEUrea (%) = 100 × normalized urine BUN × normalized serum creatinine ÷ (normalized serum BUN × normalized urine creatinine)

All four inputs must be paired to one clinical time point; urine volume is not required. [1, 2]

BUN mg/dL = urea mmol/L × 2.80112

BUN is nitrogen mass, not whole urea. Urine and serum are normalized separately, including mixed reporting systems; 2.80112 is the frozen software conversion, not a claim of unlimited measurement precision. [11, 12]

creatinine mg/dL = creatinine µmol/L ÷ 88.4

Urine and serum creatinine are independently normalized before the equation. [13]

Display: FEUrea and four normalized concentrations to two decimals

Intermediate arithmetic is not rounded; true zero remains 0.00 and a tiny positive value is shown as <0.01. Software input limits are not clinical reference intervals or diagnostic thresholds.

Interpretation

QuantityWhat it representsCalculated here
Urine BUN or whole ureaUrea-related concentration in paired urineInput / normalized
Serum BUN or whole ureaUrea-related concentration in paired serum or plasmaInput / normalized
Urine creatinineUrine concentration denominator adjustmentInput / normalized
Serum creatininePaired filtration-related concentrationInput / normalized
FEUrea / FEUNCalculated fractional-excretion percentageYes
FENaFractional excretion of sodiumNo
Historical 35% classificationStudy-specific interpretive conventionNo
AKI diagnosis or stageSerum-creatinine and urine-output clinical frameworkNo
Prerenal, intrinsic, or ATN causeEtiologic assessmentNo
Fluid, diuretic, dialysis, or treatment decisionIndividual managementNo

FEUrea is a percentage, not a urine urea concentration; FEUrea and FEUN name the same arithmetic concept on this page. The same percentage can arise from different absolute analyte values. It cannot replace the raw analytes, trends, urine output, urinalysis, microscopy, imaging, or clinical assessment, and the page generates no 35% classification, diagnosis, cause, or treatment output.

What this calculator computes

  1. Read four analytes from paired urine and serum specimens.
  2. Identify whether each urea-related result is BUN or whole urea.
  3. Normalize the urine and serum urea-related inputs independently to BUN mg/dL.
  4. Normalize urine and serum creatinine independently to mg/dL.
  5. Calculate the percentage with full-precision normalized values.
  6. Display FEUrea and all four normalized concentrations for audit.

It does not read baseline or serial creatinine, urine-output history, diuretic type, dose or timing, CKD, sepsis, urinalysis, microscopy, volume status, hemodynamics, obstruction imaging, diagnosis, or treatment information.

FEUrea, FEUN, BUN, and whole urea

FEUN emphasizes the nitrogen portion of urea; FEUrea is the common clinical shorthand used here for the same fractional-excretion-of-urea-nitrogen arithmetic. The runtime converts a whole-urea concentration to a BUN basis. BUN and whole urea are different reporting quantities, so changing only the unit label is unsafe. Independent urine and serum normalization is especially important when the two specimens use different reporting systems.[1, 11, 12]

Unit normalization before the ratio

Urine urea/BUN is converted first, serum urea/BUN is converted separately, and the two creatinine values are each converted independently before the cross-product is formed. Even when a shared conversion factor could cancel in an ideal same-basis ratio, this implementation still normalizes every input so mixed units remain explicit and the audit values expose unit errors. No intermediate value is rounded.[11, 12, 13]

Why paired specimens matter

The four analytes should represent the same clinical time point as closely as practical. Fluids, diuretics, hemodynamics, catabolism, and changing kidney function can alter the inputs. Combining different times can produce a percentage that described no single assessment. Clearing confirmation and stale output after a value or unit changes is a software safety measure.[2, 3, 9]

What fractional excretion means

FEUrea is indirect arithmetic for the fraction of a filtered urea-nitrogen load appearing in urine, using creatinine ratios to approximate the filtration relationship. It is not a direct tubular-injury measurement, GFR, eGFR, creatinine clearance, or daily urea excretion. A spot result describes one sampling time point.[1, 9]

Original Carvounis 2002 study

The early study evaluated 102 episodes of acute renal failure: 50 prerenal episodes without diuretics, 27 prerenal episodes with diuretics, and 25 cases of acute tubular necrosis. In the diuretic-treated prerenal group, 89% had FEUN below 35%. Those observations established the historical 35% context, but this was one selected cohort rather than universal modern validation.[1]

Why 35% is static research context

Low FEUrea was historically associated with a prerenal context. Later diagnostic-accuracy syntheses sometimes align direction so a higher value predicts intrinsic injury. Study direction is therefore not uniform. This page does not display low/high, positive/negative, prerenal, intrinsic, ATN, persistent, or transient labels and does not turn 35% into a color boundary.[5, 6]

Pépin 2007 contradictory performance

In 99 patients with AKI, FEUrea sensitivity and specificity were 48% and 75% without diuretics, and 79% and 33% with diuretics. The authors concluded that limited specificity prevented FEUrea from serving as a reliable automatic alternative. This page selects no cutoff from that comparison.[2]

Critical illness and sepsis limitations

Darmon 2011 included 203 ICU patients. FEUrea distinguished transient from persistent AKI with an AUC of 0.59; at 35%, sensitivity was 63% and specificity 54%, with similar results in the diuretic subgroup. Critical illness, sepsis, and complex kidney physiology cannot be assigned by one percentage.[3]

Loop diuretics can change FEUrea

Cox 2020 followed 297 patients with decompensated heart failure. After IV loop diuretic, FEUrea increased by a mean 5.6 percentage points and 27% crossed the 35% category; change correlated with diuretic response. This directly challenges the assumption that FEUrea is unaffected by loop diuretics, but the heart-failure study did not validate every AKI cause.[4]

2024 systematic review

The 2024 meta-analysis included 11 studies and 1,108 hospitalized patients. Across eight studies and 915 patients using FEUrea above 35% to distinguish intrinsic from prerenal AKI, sensitivity was 66% and specificity 75%. In four studies with 244 diuretic-treated patients, FEUrea sensitivity and specificity were 52% and 82%, compared with 92% and 44% for FENa. The synthesis found limited utility and did not establish universal superiority over FENa, even with diuretics; these are study estimates, not patient-level probabilities.[5]

2026 systematic review

The 2026 analysis included 12 studies and 1,240 patients. Overall sensitivity was 0.74, specificity 0.78, and SROC AUC 0.83, with I² of 90% for sensitivity and 93% for specificity. The diuretic subgroup had sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.87, and AUC 0.86, while subgroup heterogeneity remained substantial. GRADE certainty was low. The authors described moderate accuracy and a possible adjunct role—not stand-alone diagnosis, universal replacement, or certain etiology.[6]

FEUrea versus FENa and the expert debate

FEUrea and FENa use different analytes, so one result cannot be converted into the other. The linked PRO, CON, and commentary articles document an expert debate rather than consensus. The 2024 and 2026 reviews used different study sets, diagnostic-direction handling, and statistical models; their pooled results must not be mechanically averaged. This page claims neither test is universally superior and never recommends calculating or abandoning FENa from a submitted FEUrea result.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Worked examples from the frozen implementation

Conventional main vector

Urine BUN 300 mg/dL, serum BUN 60 mg/dL, urine creatinine 100 mg/dL, and serum creatinine 2 mg/dL produce raw FEUrea 10%, displayed as 10.00%, with normalized audit values 300.00, 60.00, 100.00, and 2.00 mg/dL.

Implementation, unit, and display audit only—not AKI diagnosis, staging, cause classification, or fluid, diuretic, or treatment instruction.

All-SI path

Urine urea 100 mmol/L, serum urea 20 mmol/L, urine creatinine 8840 µmol/L, and serum creatinine 176.8 µmol/L normalize to 280.112, 56.0224, 100, and 2 mg/dL, producing raw FEUrea 10% and display 10.00%.

Implementation, unit, and display audit only—not AKI diagnosis, staging, cause classification, or fluid, diuretic, or treatment instruction.

Mixed-unit equivalence

Urine BUN 280.112 mg/dL, serum urea 20 mmol/L, urine creatinine 100 mg/dL, and serum creatinine 176.8 µmol/L produce the same normalized values, raw 10%, and display 10.00%.

Implementation, unit, and display audit only—not AKI diagnosis, staging, cause classification, or fluid, diuretic, or treatment instruction.

True zero

Urine BUN 0 mg/dL with the other main-vector inputs produces raw FEUrea 0 and display 0.00%. This arithmetic alone cannot determine an AKI cause.

Implementation, unit, and display audit only—not AKI diagnosis, staging, cause classification, or fluid, diuretic, or treatment instruction.

Tiny positive

Urine BUN 0.049 mg/dL with serum BUN 60 mg/dL, urine creatinine 100 mg/dL, and serum creatinine 2 mg/dL produces raw FEUrea about 0.00163333%, displayed as <0.01%; normalized urine BUN displays 0.05 mg/dL rather than a false zero.

Implementation, unit, and display audit only—not AKI diagnosis, staging, cause classification, or fluid, diuretic, or treatment instruction.

When interpretation may be unreliable and what it cannot determine

Reliability may be reduced by unpaired specimens, rapidly changing AKI, CKD, sepsis or critical illness, active or recent diuretics, heart failure or rapid decongestion, catabolism, high protein intake, gastrointestinal bleeding, glucocorticoids, altered hepatic urea synthesis, dialysis, unusual muscle mass, assay or unit error, or reviewing the percentage without all four analytes.[2, 3, 4, 8]

It cannot determine AKI diagnosis or stage, prerenal, intrinsic, ATN, glomerular or obstructive cause, volume status, tubular-injury severity, fluid responsiveness, microscopy, imaging, dialysis risk, referral, admission, medicine, or treatment. AKI diagnosis and staging belong to the broader serum-creatinine and urine-output framework.[9, 10]

References

  1. Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;62(6):2223–2229. PMID 12427149. DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00683.x.
  2. Pépin MN, Bouchard J, Legault L, Ethier J. Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea and fractional excretion of sodium in patients with acute kidney injury with or without diuretic treatment. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(4):566–573. PMID 17900456. DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001.
  3. Darmon M, et al. Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea in the evaluation of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):R178. PMID 21794161. PMCID PMC3387621. DOI 10.1186/cc10327.
  4. Cox ZL, et al. Effect of Loop Diuretics on the Fractional Excretion of Urea in Decompensated Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2020;26(5):402–409. PMID 32007554. PMCID PMC7798124. DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.019.
  5. Abdelhafez MO, et al. Utility of fractional excretion of urea in acute kidney injury with comparison to fractional excretion of sodium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med Sci. 2024;368(3):224–234. PMID 38768779. DOI 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.04.021.
  6. Pan HC, Jiang ZH, Chen HY, et al. Assessing the utility of fractional excretion of urea in distinguishing intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2026;16(1):e100875. PMID 41535079. PMCID PMC12815071. DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100875.
  7. Hamadah A, Gharaibeh K. Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea are Useful Tools in the Evaluation of AKI: PRO. Kidney360. 2023;4(6):e725–e727. PMID 37384887. PMCID PMC10371381. DOI 10.34067/KID.0002492022.
  8. Aron AW, Amatruda JG. Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea are Useful Tools in the Evaluation of AKI: CON. Kidney360. 2023;4(6):e728–e730. PMID 37384888. PMCID PMC10371370. DOI 10.34067/KID.0002512022.
  9. Brown RS. Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea are Useful Tools in the Evaluation of AKI: COMMENTARY. Kidney360. 2023;4(6):e731–e733. PMID 37384889. PMCID PMC10371367. DOI 10.34067/KID.0002502022.
  10. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138.
  11. Hosten AO. BUN and Creatinine. In: Clinical Methods. 3rd ed. Chapter 193.
  12. NIST Chemistry WebBook. Urea, CAS 57-13-6. Molecular weight 60.0553.
  13. NIST Chemistry WebBook. Creatinine, CAS 60-27-5. Molecular weight 113.1179.

FAQ

Related Calculators

Disclaimer

Educational and informational reference only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or independent verification.